EU Says Attacks on Civilians in Aleppo 'Breach' Humanitarian Law

W300

The attacks on civilians in the Syrian city of Aleppo amount to a "breach of international humanitarian law," top EU officials said Saturday, urging the international community to intensify peace efforts.

"The indiscriminate suffering being caused among innocent civilians... is an unacceptable breach of international humanitarian law," EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and humanitarian commissioner Christos Stylianides said in a statement.

They denounced the "fire-bombing and shelling" as well as the "deliberate targeting" of a humanitarian convoy last week and the "cutting off of water supplies to the majority of civilians still in the city."

The aid convoy was hit by an airstrike that U.S. officials have said was carried out by Russian planes backing President Bashar Assad's regime.

U.N. officials say nearly two million civilians were left without water in the devastated northern city after regime bombardment damaged a pumping station and rebels shut down another in retaliation.

In their statement dated Brussels, Mogherini and Stylianides called the suffering caused by the attacks "an affront" to the whole world. 

"It risks to take us ever further from a negotiated settlement of the conflict, which remains the only way of bringing it to an end," they added.

The pair called on those with influence on the regime and those dealing with the armed opposition "to apply the maximum pressure to cease the attacks."

They also urged them to work to "allow unhindered and continuous humanitarian access to those in need, and resume political negotiations under the auspices of the U.N. in Geneva as swiftly as possible."

A truce deal negotiated between Moscow and Washington brought a few days of respite in Aleppo earlier this month, but no humanitarian aid before its total collapse this week.

Comments 3
Thumb chrisrushlau over 7 years

The convoy was not hit by an airstrike. Airstrikes blow things into pieces. Look at the photographs. Is the EU an official sponsor of "regime change" in Syria?
How do we understand "freedon of the press" in NATO countries: where there is more centralized government, there also seems to be more centralized media control in line with government policies. How does that happen, given there are no storm troopers in these media offices? How much is the public responsible for imperialism and racism in these NATO countries?

Thumb chrisrushlau over 7 years

I'm sorry, not "clear" but "amounts to" and "unacceptable". At least they didn't add insult to injury.

Missing arturo over 7 years

If the EU truly believes this and has evidence to support it they should raise it at the UN Human Rights Council. The Council would immediately condemn all those responsible.