Iran Says Nuclear Talks with World Powers on April 13

W300

Long-stalled talks between Iran and world powers are to be revived on April 13 at a place yet to be agreed, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi was quoted as saying on Wednesday by official media.

Salehi announced the date as he welcomed visiting Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to Tehran for a two-day visit focusing on Iran's nuclear program and bilateral ties, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

"The venue will be announced in coming days," IRNA quoted Salehi as saying.

Salehi added that Iran considered Istanbul -- the location of the previous round of talks, which collapsed in January 2011 -- the "best place" but that options were still being discussed.

Iran's principal nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, would announce any agreement on where the talks will take place, Salehi said.

The discussions are to be held between Iran and the so-called P5+1 group comprising the five permanent U.N. Security Council members -- the United States, Russia, France, Britain and China -- plus Germany.

The office of EU foreign policy Chief Catherine Ashton, who represents the P5+1, had said as recently as Tuesday that no date or venue had yet been agreed.

Western diplomats accredited to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna also told Agence France Presse up to Tuesday that they were not aware of any agreement fixing the place and date of the talks.

The talks carry hopes of defusing a tense international showdown over Iran's nuclear activities that has sent oil prices soaring.

Israel has brandished the threat of possible military action against Iran's nuclear sites, while the United States has put its energies into sanctions and diplomacy but has not ruled out the military option.

Comments 2
Default-user-icon Muhamada (Guest) 12 years

The entire world is wrong and they are right, does that make any sense?

Thumb beiruti 12 years

What to make of this. It could mean one of two things. First, it could be the clearest indication that Iran does not give the Assad Regime much chance of survival and with Assad going down, Hezbollah becoming isolated thereby, and Iran thus becoming progressively more exposed to Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities, it is in its strongest negotiating position today, as compared to tomorrow, so better to work out an arrangement now and get better terms.
Second, it could be a buying time measure for Assad, or even leverage to help save Assad so that Iran can preserve its deterrent in Hezbollah by saving the Assad Regime in exchange for "talks".
It is up to the P5+1 to insure that the first option is the one that is followed