Saudi King Abdullah Passes Away, Prince Salman Ascends to Throne

Saudi Arabia's elderly King Abdullah died on Friday and was replaced by his half-brother Salman as the absolute ruler of the world's top oil exporter and the spiritual home of Islam.
The royal court said in a statement that Abdullah, believed to be around 90, died at 1:00 am local time (2200 GMT), expressing its "great sadness and mourning".
Salman, 79, had been defense minister and previously governor of the capital Riyadh.
Another of the late monarch's half-brothers, Moqren, was named the new crown prince.
Abdullah will be buried later Friday following afternoon prayers, and citizens would be invited to pledge allegiance to the new monarch and the crown prince at the royal palace, the statement said.
The royal court did not disclose the cause of Abdullah's death, but he was hospitalized in December suffering from pneumonia and had been breathing with the aid of a tube.
Under Abdullah, who took the throne in 2005, Saudi Arabia has been a key ally of Washington in the Arab world, most recently joining the US-led coalition carrying out air strikes against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq.
U.S. President Barack Obama was quick to pay tribute to Abdullah as a valued ally.
"As our countries worked together to confront many challenges, I always valued King Abdullah's perspective and appreciated our genuine and warm friendship," Obama said in a written statement shortly after the monarch's death.
"The closeness and strength of the partnership between our two countries is part of King Abdullah's legacy."
As the top producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Saudi Arabia has been the driving force behind the cartel's refusal to slash output to support oil prices, which have fallen by more than 50 percent since June.
The two main global crude contracts surged Friday following Abdullah's death, amid uncertainty over whether the new king would maintain that policy.
- Royal family stalwart -
The kingdom is also home to Islam's holiest sites, Mecca and Medina, and its role as a spiritual leader for Sunni Muslims has seen it vying for influence with Shiite-dominated Iran.
Behind his thick, always jet-black moustache and goatee, Abdullah had a shrewd grasp of regional politics.
Wary of the rising influence of Islamist movements, Saudi Arabia has been a generous supporter of Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah al-Sisi since the army's ouster of Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood.
It has also played a key role in supporting opposition to Iran-backed President Bashar Assad of Syria, allowing U.S. troops to use its territory to train rebel fighters.
Salman, the new king, is widely expected to follow closely in Abdullah's footsteps, in foreign and energy policy as well as in making moderate reforms to the deeply conservative kingdom.
Abdullah pushed through cautious changes while in power, challenging conservatives with moves such as including women in the Shura Council, an advisory body.
He promoted the kingdom's economic development and oversaw its accession to the World Trade Organization, tapping into the country's massive oil wealth to build new economic cities, universities and high-speed railways.
But Saudi Arabia is still strongly criticized for a dismal human rights record, including the imprisonment of dissidents. It is also the only country in the world that does not allow women to drive.
Salman is a stalwart of the royal family credited with transforming Riyadh during his half-century as governor from a backwater to a thriving capital.
Recent years have seen concerns over his health after operations on his back, but Salman took on an increasingly high-profile role as Abdullah's own health issues forced him from the limelight.
- 'We all lost a father' -
Abdullah named Moqren as deputy crown prince last March, in an unprecedented move aimed at smoothing succession hurdles.
Moqren, a former intelligence chief, was a trusted confidant of Abdullah with a reputation as a liberal.
A former air force officer born in 1945, Moqren is the youngest son of King Abdul Aziz bin Saud, the founder of Saudi Arabia.
Since King Abdul Aziz's death in 1952 the throne has systematically passed from one of his sons to another.
Abdul Aziz had 45 recorded sons and Abdullah, Salman and Moqren were all born to different mothers.
The new king will face some major hurdles, especially as falling oil prices cut into state revenues.
Saudi Arabia has managed to avoid the social upheaval that has shaken many of its neighbors in recent years, thanks in large part to massive public spending.
The country has amassed enormous financial reserves, but has already projected a huge deficit of $38.6 billion for this year.
Many Saudis turned to social media to mourn the king.
The broadcaster who read the announcement of his death wearing a dark robe and traditional shemagh head covering, Abdullah al-Shihri, said on Twitter it had pained him to break the news.
"I did not wish to announce this news," he wrote. "May God have mercy on Abdullah bin Abdulaziz. Sincere prayers for his successor and crown prince."
Abdullah Saadoon, a member of the Shura Council and retired general, said Abdullah had "laid the foundations of a blessed renaissance" in Saudi Arabia.
Another Twitter user, Shaima, said: "We didn't lose a king, we all lost a father".

Unlike you Mystic and most HA fanatics, most of M-14ers believe in the Holy Cedar as our symbol,in the Lebanon as our home, and in our President as the highest reference.
But you make your Khomeinni proud.

well said mystic

Your next King will be nowhere as senior as this one. The Wahabi King has finally fallen lads, bright day for us all, now since the arms deal dies along with him. Means we can turn over to Iran let them arm the LAF.

helicopter, this "holy" king of Saud was the hand that fed you. That is the reason M14 are in sorrow this minute.
Rich hypocrites the lot of you.

Maybe the Khomeini hand feeds you and therefore you extrapolate and exxpect the same from others. Let me repeat myself I am 100% Lebanese and have no use for your Bashar, your Khomeini or for King Abdallah.

You mention it, as if it was a secret. I do follow Ayatollah Khamanei in faith/religion, he is a good teacher. I work and feed myself though, unlike the Mostaqbal, and LF that gets all their donations from the Saudis.
Now that has nothing to do with the LAF, why do you not want Iran to supply the Lebanese Army?

Because whoever arms, finance and uses a sectarian militia within Lebanon is not suitable to arm the LAF.

Yes, but the new one is nowhere as senior or experienced, as the dead kingpin Abdullah.

@pajama boy
I have not seen any weapons delivered yet. Please correct me if I am wrong
so far only talks

Those hellfire missiles are garbage, without any real planes to use it with. The U.S gave the Iraqi army the same, and they haven't been used so far, because of the lack of any real aircraft.

Texi, you are the most ignorant guy on Naharnet, conversations with you for years never carried fruit. Ofcourse what to expect from a wahabi. Hellfire rockets are american, they need a special guidance system to be accurate. Stop contradicting yourself for once.

bye bye terrorist!

Hey guys
I agree so far only talks . All I know Hariri and the Saudis bought Beirut one cent to $10,000

texa, you should be appointed to the next heir of the throne Al Saud.
That would surely lead to the Wahabi kingdoms downfall. Alongside your pro zionist conspiracy theories.

Loooooooooool Iran would gladly donate tons of weapons to the LAF as long as they share them with Hezbollah

The Resistance got enough weapons already, all we need is a greenlight, then we would see massive arms transportations from Iran, not being blocked.
It has to be official though, but the U.S will never accept it. The U.S wants the LAF weak. They can barely fight off the takfiris in Arsal, they need better weapons.
I guess you are among those, that wants Lebanon as part of Israel, so we do not need a strong LAF at all.

Mystic, of course the US won't accept Iran sending weapons to Lebanon. What is Iran gonna send, besides Fajr rockets? The idea of Iran arming the LAF is implausible, it's not gonna happen. Now, does the US want the LAF to be weak? Perhaps. The US does not want the LAF confronting Israel, but more importantly it does not want the LAF sharing these weapons with Hezbollah and coordinating with them. As for the $3 billion weapons deal between KSA and France, they're waiting to see who becomes president. They don't want Aoun to be president and controlling the LAF.

Oh really, do you think fajr rockets is the weaponry, that makes the U.S have second thoughts of invading Iran?
You have no idea, about Irans modern warfare and weaponry these days.

Mystic, who gives a damn about Fajr rockets, I was making a joke. You ignored my whole post except these stupid Fajr rockets?? I provided my thoughts on the whole US-KSA-France-LAF circus and all you reply to is a joke I made about Fajr rockets lmao. Talking to you is indeed a waste of time.

A waste of time indeed.

Iran would gladly donate tons of weapons to the LAF, but the pro western M14, keeps rejecting it. Therefore blocking all deals with Iran, in favor of the U.S sanctions.

Spot on, Texas.

Back in 2000? The U.S had a full blockade in the mediterranean sea, Israel had just retreated from Lebanon the West was in panic, yeah right send dozens of weapons, and let you Americans confiscate it?
Very smart texas.

Spot on, Texas.

Spot on, Texas.

Back in 2000? The U.S had a full blockade in the mediterranean sea, Israel had just retreated from Lebanon the West was in panic, yeah right send dozens of weapons, and let you Americans confiscate it?
Very smart texas.

Yeah right, that is why the resistance have to go through dozen of Israeli air raids to transfer rockets across the border.

I can tell, that you have no knowledge of military equipment texas.
Rockets can easily be seperated into several parts, you don't just seperate a heavy armored battle tank, and smuggle it across the border.
Today is not your day texas, I can understand since your father in law. King Abdollah passed away.

Spot on, Texas. Couldn't be said better, but let me reiterate your point to Mystic.
Mystic, the US did not have an embargo on Syria, and since Syria controlled Lebanon, your patron Iran could have easily sent anything to Syria, who could then transport it to Lebanon -- it could have even used UPS Ground to accomplish this task lmao.
Mystic, you're coming up with excuses for Iran to not send weapons to Lebanon before the West imposed sanctions on them.

Mystic, so what about 2001, 2002, 2003...?

I can't believe you people, don't you know the U.S had a blockade outside Lebanese seas for years? They still do.
Read facts, and you will realize the U.S sanctions are the main reason for lack of LAF arms, Lebanon is a very strategic area, so close to Israel. They will never let the LAF, carry such heavy weaponry.
Jordan is okay, Saudi is okay, the rest of the pro western middle east, is fine. Just never Lebanon, think for yourself.

Hijacked and occupied the Lebanese state lmaooooooooo let me ask you: do you see Mustaqbal with a militia of 30,000 men and 50,000 rockets assassinating Hezbollah leaders and boycotting all the state institutions?? The answer is no. While KSA has their influence in Lebanon, to say it has hijacked Lebanon is ignorant given Hezbollah has a militia more powerful than the state's armed forces.

What good equipment did the Saudis provide the LAF? The Army is still driving around old rusty M113's tin cans, that gets crushed by a single RPG rocket bursting through it's thin armor.

The LAF, is the worst equipped army in the whole middle east, and these false deals, are meant to pleasure us all? It is a fake gentleman, the longer you realize that, the longer the LAF will remain weak.

Mystic, read my post again. Did I say anything about KSA providing weapons to the LAF?

Read above, and look at your M14 minions, claiming Saudis did anything for the LAF. Why do you not correct them then?

Mystic, you were my responding to my initial post, which had nothing to do with KSA supporting the LAF. My post about the KSA and the LAF can be seen further up (where you say the US wants the LAF to be weak).

Anonym texas
why rouh zahhit. I speak the truth. Do you really think the Saudis are lebanon's friend. If so explain to me how Hariri and the Saudis bought Beirut real estate so cheap??
Get real my friend no one helps Lebanon for free and certainly not our corrupt leaders dead or alive. they sell the country for their deep pockets

Rest in Peace and Hope that KSA will be a with Lebanon as always did.
Hope all the Good For King Salman Bin Abdel Aziz Al Saoud.

@anonym
Here is the truth
I appreciated your earlier comments but to be honest with you lately you have so lame you as well as the regulars on this site
Can you ever think once about Lebanon rather than play that stupid mutual blame between M8 and m14?
you guys are so lame so polarized can you ever think that this very polarization is harming Lebanon?
can you think for once Lebanon before m8 or M14 who are equally corrupt??

anonym
read again my comment I did mention both M8 and m14 being equally bad

@miss tx
the point I was trying to make is that this mutual blame is so polarizing and so divisive and so harmful to Lebanon's interests but they don't care....

Coolmec and Texas, let me attempt to settle your differences:
Texas is right when he says ending Hezbollah's control of Lebanon is the core of putting Lebanon ahead, and that everyone needs to adhere to the dissociation policy.
Coolmec is right when he says M8 and M14 are equally corrupt. Hariri and his cronies -- like Sanioura, who was his finance minister -- stole a lot of money and evicted people out of their homes to rebuild Beirut. Hariri had $1 billion in 1992, and $16 billion when he died in 2005. Hariri gave kickbacks to Syrian politicians, and Hariri basically wrote up Ta'ef which was meant for him to take over postwar Lebanon.

Texas, I won't forget that. But don't forget that Rafiq Hariri wrote Ta'ef for himself. Through his company Solidere, he forced people to sell their homes in exchange for shares in the company, when the shares weren't even worth 15% the value of their properties (read that sentence again and it will make sense). I mean, that's big-time corruption. While yes, Mustaqbal was the main force behind the Cedar Revolution, never forget that Hariri was the one who supported the Syrian occupation via Ta'ef to begin with. It was only when he had enough (14 years later) that he tried doing something.

@nick james
Thank you for your balanced comment I agree with you in the sense that ALL our leaders are corrupt.
Pity the country
Pity its people

You're welcome coolmec

Yeah Flamey, the Christians stealing land includes no other than Youssef Kanaan...

(continued)
Aoun and Geagea is another debate, but they are both equally as corrupt too. The point is, none of these politicians represent Lebanon. The government should be overthrown and all these politicians should be imprisoned for treachery. But, since that is not happening anytime soon, who is more to blame for the instability? The answer is March 8. I don't see Mustaqbal with a militia of 30,000 men controlling a third of the country and boycotting the state institutions the last time I checked.

M14 controls 2/3 lmaooooooooo oh Flamey that's the best joke I've heard from you in a while.

I want knafeh

Alla yer7amo wyej3alo fi janni
M14's kingpin is finished.