Obama Warns against Premature Iran Strike, Says Assad Days 'Numbered'

U.S. President Barack Obama warned a premature attack on Iran would allow it to play the "victim" in the nuclear crisis, noting that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's "days are numbered," in remarks published Friday days before he meets Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu.
In some of his toughest comments yet on Tehran's nuclear drive, Obama also warned Israel and Iran should take seriously possible U.S. action against Iranian nuclear facilities if sanctions fail to stop the country's atomic ambitions.
"I think that the Israeli government recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don't bluff," Obama told the Atlantic Monthly magazine.
"I also don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."
Netanyahu arrived in Canada early Friday ahead of discussions Monday with Obama at the White House, and the Israeli leader this week said Iran's nuclear program will be "at the center of our talks."
Tehran insists its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only but Western nations suspect the Islamic republic is leading a covert program to develop a nuclear weapons capability and is not far from achieving its goal.
Netanyahu's government has maintained that all options remain on the table with regard to action on Iran, whose firebrand leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has questioned Israel's right to exist.
But Obama issued a blunt warning against any premature strike.
"At a time when there is not a lot of sympathy for Iran and its only real ally (Syria) is on the ropes, do we want a distraction in which suddenly Iran can portray itself as a victim?" Obama said.
Even if Israel were not a specific target of Iran's wrath, Obama said "it would still be a profound national-security interest of the United States to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon."
Obama said the U.S. strategy to thwart Iran's ambitions of developing a nuclear weapon included various components, including isolating Tehran politically, sanctions and diplomacy.
"And it includes a military component. And I think people understand that," Obama said, adding he thought Americans did not believe that "I hesitate to make decisions as commander in chief when necessary."
He also spoke of the "profound" risks of an Iranian nuclear weapon falling into "terrorists' hands," and warned of "the prospect of a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region in the world, one that is rife with unstable governments and sectarian tensions.
"And it would also provide Iran the additional capability to sponsor and protect its proxies in carrying out terrorist attacks because they are less fearful of retaliation," he said.
Turning to Syria, Obama said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's "days are numbered," adding Washington was working to accelerate the transition to democracy there.
"It is our estimation that (Assad's) days are numbered. It's a matter not of if but when."
"Now, can we accelerate that? We're working with the world community to try to do that," he said.
Obama acknowledged that Syria is bigger, more sophisticated and more complicated than Libya, and that countries like Russia are blocking U.N. action.
However, he pointed to U.S. efforts through the "Friends of Syria" group to promote humanitarian relief to cities under attack from Syrian forces.
"But they can also accelerate a transition to a peaceful and stable and representative Syrian government," he said. "If that happens, that will be a profound loss for Iran."
Experts in Israel say Netanyahu's discussions with Obama will be a chance for the allies to sound each other out on their sometimes divergent positions on Tehran's nuclear program.
Israeli President Shimon Peres told the New York Times Thursday that the United States must make it clear to Iran that "all options are on the table."
"We need a total and clear commitment that the catastrophe of Iran will not create an impossible situation," Peres said, acknowledging there was disagreement over where to draw the red line that would spark military action.
Obama, who addresses the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee on Sunday, admitted to differences with Netanyahu in the Atlantic interview, describing their relationship as one focused on business and noting they came from different political traditions.
"But one thing I have found in working with Prime Minister Netanyahu is that we can be very frank with each other, very blunt with each other, very honest with each other," he said.
"For the most part, when we have our differences, they are tactical and not strategic," he said. "We have a common vision about where we want to go."
"At any given moment -- as is true, frankly, with my relationship with every other foreign leader -- there's not going to be a perfect alignment of how we achieve these objectives," he said.

Milosevic died a few years ago

god bless america
i think mr president you say that democracu should prevail in all arab countries including the gulf countries

an attack against iran will not happen, but an attack against hizbushaitan is now inevitable, and this is what they will discuss.
again: destruction of hizbushaitan, will speed the fall of bashar's regime, and further isolate iran as a paria state until it implodes from within.

They were stabbed in the back, that's what happened. These guys were the US favorite figures, including Bashar. Like the Lebanese forces were the Israelis favorites, this is why they withdrew quickly from different areas in Lebanon, wanting them to be slaughtered. Yet most of you learned nothing.

What is your point? The US did not install any of them into power, they acquired power on their own. The US acts in their self-interest, just like every other country. That means supporting some governments temporarily but not permanently. Every 4 years the US elects a new president, and he is free to make his own foreign policy, included which governments to support or not support.
The US supported Saddam against Iran, so what? That does not mean they cannot go against him later when he outlives his usefulness.
The US never supported Qaddafi. Qaddafi was a pariah who financed terrorism in many places. The west NEGOTIATED with Qaddafi to give up his nukes and to buy his oil, but he was never their "favorite".
Mubarak made peace with Israel, so the US supported him. So what? That does not mean support at any cost, nor does it mean keep him in power forever. The US supports democracy and the people didn't want Mubarek. The US helped nurture pro-democracy movements in Egypt

Tony... Saddam rose through the ranks of the Baath party in Iraq and took over after he forced Al Bakr to resign in 1979.
Qaddafi seized power in a bloodless military coup in 1969 without help from the US.
Mubarek became vice president in 1975 and assumed presidency when Sadat was killed in 1981.
What is your point Tony?

Hope you will not outlive your usefulness. Foreign policy in america is dictated from Israel, no matter who is the president. US could care less about your democracy. If they did, Saudi would be the first to go.

Of course there are example of where the US propped up foreign regimes at the expense of democracy, but that was mostly in years past, when they were still fighting the cold war against communism and leftist leaders.
The bottom line is this: the US should be congratulated for not supporting Saddam, or Qaddafy, or Mubarek, and yet you try to paint that as a negative.
Bashar was never a "favorite" of the US. He hosted Hamas, PFLP and other terrorist groups, he financed violence and anti-US activities in Iraq, he committed crimes in Lebanon, he smuggled arms to Hezbollah, and the big one..... he got to cozy with Ayatollah. The US only tolerated Assad because he kept the border quiet with Israel.
They will always act in their best interest, like any other country, and now their best interest is to see Bashar fall from power. Iran on the other hand is helping Assad kill women and children and they will pay a price for that.

Who created Hamas, since you know too much. Not Israel, so they stand against the PLO.

I want you to be governed by nobody. I want Lebanon for Lebanon. But all of you chose to play sides, instead of uniting.

Geha.....I think you are correct, but in reverse. I think the attack on the Hezz will occur after Bashar is gone to cut off any re-supply from Bashar. Hitting them without re-supply will cripple them harder.
they know this. That is why their shabiha are in Syria.

get rid of iran and hezbola quick

We thought that we, the Lebanese, were the only ones blessed with a great seer as Dr. Samir Abdullatif! Now we discover that there is also Dr. Barak Abdullatif on the other side of the globe! I guess for some Godly reason, God did not break the cast after he created the first of these two greats! Let's hope we will hear from either one an update as to the precise number of days so that we can start the countdown. We have been relying on Gabby, allouchi, thepatriot, realist, peace, slash... but they have not delivered on any of their predictions yet. So why not go to the source?

hope the war with iran and israel and hiz start now before summer time so we can get a nice touristic summmer

iran is the best friend of israel, as always against the arabs.these words are for shamir in 1987 long after the "islamic" revolution.

If the US decided to take on Assad, The US flag will be over Damascus in less than 1 hour.

The US and russia both agree tacitly on Assad departure (only an idiot in politics could imagine a peaceful solution with assad in power); however, it seems they both agree on increasing the suffering of the Syrian people until they agree to the solution imposed eventualy by the world powers i.e yemeni style. The US wants the army/government intact in any solution to keep the status quo with israel, russia also agrees on that and wants to ensure its own interests: this is the real reason behind the temporary support for assad. Russia could care less if ties between the future damascus and iran are severed. Major changes in the Syrian regime will take place but not dramatic ones. Russia/US both agree on severing the iranian component. They also agree on keeping considerable power in the hands of the minorities. Remember how long the yemeni ordeal took?? the outcome was the departure of the president but significant status quo "stability" remained.

They think the Iranian are lunatics.

Guys do you think that bombing Syria or Iran would bring you democracy to the region?It will be catastrophic not only for Syria or Iran but also for you in Lebanon, because your whole economies will sink. Don’t be that happy because you will lose your life in a war environment and others country will benefit from you to increase their income by selling you arms to kill your brothers.You should do your best to preserve calm no matter if you don’t like a specific person. I think all leaders have their days numbered. And we don’t need Obama to tell us who should stay or who should go, especially those countries that support the people who bomb themselves to bring democracy. The only country in the region where democracy should be under protest is Saudi Arabia. Let them protest on the roads like they do in Syria, let their woman go on the road to protest…Saudi is another story but its turn is also coming.

But for now they are funding... So standbye

and 5 mins to demolish iran
Obama read our forum threads. Indeed, someone from here knots saying exactly what Barack said: "Assad's days are numbered". There's no need to strike Iran yet, but it will be after Bashar goes down. Remember how it seemed unreal to imagine Saddam Hussein, Hosni Moubarak, Moaamar Ghaddafior even more Ossama BenLaden being dealt with? Guess what! It happened.!!!! A fair trial would be disgusting as I'd rather see him get stabbed to death but a true justice demands a fair trial. So be it (unless he's too coward and commits suicide a la hitler style). Milosevic is feeling lonely in his cell at the Hague... He's willing to learn English and Arabic to talk to his friend to be... The Assad clan. And I bet he'll learn Farsi as well to talk with Nasrallah.